Skip to content

Create RFP-003 for privacy-preserving bridge infrastructure#6

Open
hackyguru wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
rfp003
Open

Create RFP-003 for privacy-preserving bridge infrastructure#6
hackyguru wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
rfp003

Conversation

@hackyguru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This document outlines the requirements and expectations for a privacy-preserving bridge and cross-chain infrastructure, detailing functionality, security, usability, and team profile needed for development.

This document outlines the requirements and expectations for a privacy-preserving bridge and cross-chain infrastructure, detailing functionality, security, usability, and team profile needed for development.
@hackyguru hackyguru self-assigned this Mar 7, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@fryorcraken fryorcraken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of things to fix before merge:

  1. Wrong file path: The file is placed at RFPs/RFPs/RFP-003-... (double RFPs/). Please move it to RFPs/RFP-003-bridges-cross-chain-infrastructure.md.

  2. README not updated: Please add RFP-003 to the summary table in README.md between the RFP_TABLE_START / RFP_TABLE_END markers.

@fryorcraken
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Note: the license section in RFPs/RFP-000-template.md should be updated to reflect MIT+Apache2.0 dual license to match this RFP.

@fryorcraken
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The title (and scope) is very broad. Before this RFP moves forward, we should discuss and decide what specific type(s) of bridges we want to see — e.g., Ethereum-only vs. multi-chain, lock-and-mint vs. burn-and-mint, trustless ZK light client vs. relayer-based, etc.

@davidrusu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

davidrusu commented May 4, 2026

Reading through this, It's presenting Logos as a "Privacy Preserving L1" we should be very clear here that the L1 is not the target for these atomic swaps.

These atomic swaps are done against LEZ.

It's a more complicated story but we should make it clear what the goal is: LEZ is where we have privacy preserving programmable money, the L1 is the settlement layer for Zones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants